(Braudel 1981) can be seen to support Rouse’s theory by
his own idea that fashion began by noblemen, squires and the bourgeoisie
wearing tunics ‘so tight that they revealed what modesty bids us to hide.’
The reason for doing this can be seen as a show of
male masculinity thus
creating an unconscious link between this way of dressing and their power in
society as men and as the Elite ruling class. (Wilson 1985) suggests that it
began in the 14th Century with the changing of a series of styles that was
determined by the Royal court right up until the 18th Century.
The idea that women’s fashion in the 19th Century
demonstrates the wearer’s ‘abstinence from productive employment’ supports
the idea that fashion helps and is part of the process of creating an
identify. This can be seen by the fact women wore bonnets, long skirts long
hair that prevented and restricted their movement to a minimum, thus the
idea that they were dependant on men was strengthened and their position in
society.
It suggests that fashion underlines sexuality so when
clothes are worn to produced gender bending ideals it makes the majority
feel threatened. He also thinks that exaggerated standards of beauty ‘can be
disempowering and even offensive’. My first example (see appendix 1) is
Christina Aguilera at the Music awards in Edinburgh 2003. The clothes she
chose to wear to this event do not reflect conventional ideas of femininity,
and for this she has been criticised by the magazine. Her first outfit is a
torn tie-dyed dress and seems to be ‘Tasteful’ due to the fact it is a dress
and reflects the gender identity allocated conventionally to it. In total
contrast the next outfit is very domineering. It consists of leather
trousers a
bra and a little lace top. In contrast to the last outfit she
wears her hair up as apposed to wearing it naturally. In wearing this she is
creating an aggressive
masculine image however, the magazine writer has
mocked her by saying she has ‘forgotten her top’ suggesting that what she
wears is not acceptable in society as it does not reflect her sexuality.
The
next outfit creates a strange image for her. We suppose it is a female one
as she is in a skirt; however this outfit goes completely against convention
and makes the viewer slightly uneasy as we try to guess what identity she is
trying to convey. This could be seen as Wilson’s idea of exaggerated
standards of beauty. In her next outfit her image again has undergone a
complete change. She is in trousers which do add an n image of dominance it
is toned down by the neutral colour of it. However the top with it reflects
femininity by the fact it has a bow, which is quite a feminine idea or has
been allocated female identity. In contrast the next outfit uses the same
colour as the previous shirt, in a way that exaggerates femininity. However
it is paired with a pair of trouser s that create a very masculine image.
The fact that she does not reflect a set gender in her clothes again or the
viewer is slightly uncomfortable. In her next outfit seems to create a
gothic image that the magazine takes the piss out of perhaps because it does
not reflect female gender identity. This is in contrast to the last outfits
she wears which do create and conform to the identity of a conventional
woman, however the last one in particular is again a very extreme version of
this thus the magazine calls it ‘ridiculous’.
It can be said then that the clothes Christina Aguilera
wears on this night does create a certain gender identity, however whether
we as viewers accept her decisions to wear the clothes depends on whether
the reflect already existing gender identity in a way which is not
excessively extreme. It can also be said that she is trying to escape the
false and constricting ideology of feminism. She is in a way reversing
gender roles by wearing trousers